Skip to main content

Section Education

ICAI plots AI and data analytics inside the CA course—CRET review, public feedback, and a ~2028 rollout

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India is not treating artificial intelligence as a siloed “CS elective” for accountants: **President CA Prasanna Kumar D** told **PTI** (as carried by **The Times of India**) that **without AI, no chartered accountant can survive**, while a new **Committee for Review of Education and Training (CRET)** rewrites syllabus, **articleship**, exams, and soft skills ahead of a **December** recommendation cut-off and a **2028**-ish implementation horizon.

NewsTenet Education deskPublished 8 min read
India Post 2018 commemorative stamp for the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India—Wikimedia Commons image of a postage design; it symbolises the profession, not ICAI’s live exam calendar or any unpublished CRET draft.

India’s Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) is preparing a broad refresh of what it means to qualify as a CA, with artificial intelligence, data analytics, environmental, social and governance (ESG) themes, and sustainability literacy explicitly on the table alongside traditional assurance and tax depth. In remarks attributed to ICAI President CA Prasanna Kumar D in a Press Trust of India interview carried by The Times of India, the Institute frames technology as core professional infrastructure, not an optional hobby: “For an engineer, AI is a separate subject but for us, AI is not a subject but without AI, no chartered accountant can survive. Be it in employment or in practice, AI is a must,” the president is quoted as saying.

The same reporting describes a newly constituted Committee for Review of Education and Training (CRET) tasked with reviewing the entire existing curriculum—subjects, training (articleship), communication skills, and the assessment system—with recommendations expected by December followed by a public feedback phase, and an updated course footprint likely from 2028.

That sequencing matters for students already inside the New Scheme of Education and Training launched in 2023: the point is continuity plus layering, not an overnight exam-code rewrite announced in a single PDF.

What CRET is supposed to settle

According to the PTI-sourced education desk summary, CRET’s remit spans what should be taught, how long practical training should stay aligned with industry tooling, and how examinations reward applied judgement rather than only rote formats. Because articleship is explicitly in scope, the review could touch firm rotation rules, mentor supervision norms, and the balance between compliance-heavy engagements versus analytics-heavy internal audit rotations—each a choke point where data skills either become muscle memory or remain slide-deck theatre.

ICAI hosts formal committee landing pages for CRET on icai.org; students should read them alongside Central Council leadership notices, because static membership tables sometimes lag mid-term appointments.

How this lines up with ICAI’s existing AI desk narrative

Parallel to syllabus politics, ICAI maintains an “AI in ICAI” microsite that already markets a roadmap tone: it states an intention that, by 2026, optional AI modules can sit inside the syllabus framework for students who want deeper tracks in AI, data science, and forensic analytics, while allowing foundational analytics ideas to seep into core papers over time. Treat that web copy as institutional intent, not a substitute for the Board of Studies gazette that actually binds examiners—but it shows the communications strategy: certificate ladders now, credit-bearing integration next.

Readers hunting product names will also see references there to tools such as ICAI CA GPT and packaged certificate programmes; the curriculum news is about where those skills earn examination credit, not only CPD badges.

Why accounting regulators worldwide are converging on data fluency

Even without ICAI’s quotes, the macro pressure is visible in corporate disclosures: ESG assurance requests, digital ledger trails, continuous controls monitoring, and fraud analytics tied to unstructured invoices and chat logs all push audit firms to hire and train differently. India’s -denominated fraud-loss estimates cited in ICAI’s own AI collateral are best read as order-of-magnitude advocacy statistics—useful for why a president speaks urgently, not as peer-reviewed national accounts.

The competitive angle is simpler: Big Four and mid-tier employers already expect SQL, visualisation, and model-documentation hygiene on some engagements; a CA Final syllabus that still treats those as extracurricular creates a wedge between credential and first-year job reality.

What students and employers should calendar

Until CRET publishes chapter-level drafts, the actionable to-do list is short: track December for whether the committee hits its deadline, watch for public consultation PDFs (they usually land on icai.org with comment windows), and model two timelines—early adopters who self-study analytics now versus exam-bound learners who wait for study-material ISBNs that match the final blueprint. Firms that rely on articles for cheap compliance hours should also scenario-plan if training months shift toward analytics rotations that burn supervisor capacity faster.

If implementation truly lands near 2028, today’s Intermediate batches are the first that must assume digital assessment items are examinable, not merely “nice in interviews.”

Geography and themes

Related places and recurring themes for this story.

Sources and external links

Sources and filings our editors consulted to verify this story. External links open in a new tab.